Say we have txA and txB, and txB contains an input that redeems an output from txA.
In order for a block containing both txA and txB to be valid, is it necessary that txB be after txA in the list of transactions for that block?
Asked
Active
Viewed 49 times
2
-
Related: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/35719/is-there-a-fixed-order-for-all-transactions-in-the-block-chain/35726#35726 – morsecoder Aug 25 '15 at 20:39
-
While I agree that the question is the same, the answer to the other question is simply a long-winded "yes", without any references or sources. How can I mark an answer as correct if I can't judge whether it's correct or not? – runeks Aug 28 '15 at 12:17